Attention, in and out : scalp-level and Intracranial EEG correlates of interoception and exteroception
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor/s:
García-Cordero, Indira
Esteves, Sol
Mikulan, Ezequiel P.
Hesse, Eugenia
Baglivo, Fabricio H.
Silva, Walter
García, María del Carmen
Vaucheret, Esteban
Ciraolo, Carlos
García, Hernando S.
Adolfi, Federico
Pietto, Marcos
Herrera, Eduar
Legaz, Agustina
Manes, Facundo
García, Adolfo M.
Sigman, Mariano
Bekinschtein, Tristan A.
Ibáñez, Agustín
Sedeño, Lucas
Date:
2017-07-19Abstract
Interoception, the monitoring of visceral signals, is often presumed to engage
attentional mechanisms specifically devoted to inner bodily sensing. In fact, most
standardized interoceptive tasks require directing attention to internal signals. However,
most studies in the field have failed to compare attentional modulations between
internally- and externally-driven processes, thus probing blind to the specificity of the
former. Here we address this issue through a multidimensional approach combining
behavioral measures, analyses of event-related potentials and functional connectivity
via high-density electroencephalography, and intracranial recordings. In Study 1, 50
healthy volunteers performed a heartbeat detection task as we recorded modulations
of the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) in three conditions: exteroception, basal
interoception (also termed interoceptive accuracy), and post-feedback interoception
(sometimes called interoceptive learning). In Study 2, to evaluate whether key
interoceptive areas (posterior insula, inferior frontal gyrus, amygdala, and somatosensory
cortex) were differentially modulated by externally- and internally-driven processes,
we analyzed human intracranial recordings with depth electrodes in these regions.
This unique technique provides a very fine grained spatio-temporal resolution
compared to other techniques, such as EEG or fMRI. We found that both
interoceptive conditions in Study 1 yielded greater HEP amplitudes than the
exteroceptive one. In addition, connectivity analysis showed that post-feedback
interoception, relative to basal interoception, involved enhanced long-distance
connections linking frontal and posterior regions. Moreover, results from Study 2 showed a differentiation between oscillations during basal interoception (broadband:
35–110 Hz) and exteroception (1–35 Hz) in the insula, the amygdala, the somatosensory
cortex, and the inferior frontal gyrus. In sum, this work provides convergent evidence for
the specificity and dynamics of attentional mechanisms involved in interoception.
URI:
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00411https://repositorio.utdt.edu/handle/20.500.13098/11064